Saturday, April 29, 2006

Not those two, please, nooooooooo...

Now what can I say about this? Sheesh!

And yes, Gault?

Another way to send me to an early grave.

10 comments:

  1. Anonymous7:09 am

    Who is John Gault??

    Hehe could not resist that :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:24 pm

    Thought it wud have been made into a movie much earlier !! Wonder how they are gonna show those long speeches of D'Anconia and John Galt !! That wud be fun !!

    P.S - Maybe we can make it into a tamil movie - Have Trisha as the heroine and Ajith as the hero('Citizen' style)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous9:15 pm

    blistering barnacles!!! I am no fan(atic) of Rand and is one fo ehr critics when it coems to her biased views on collectivism but even me have to accept this book of hers deserves a better pair...Brad Pitt and jolie just doesnt fit in :|

    Btw long time..and loved your previous post....:) Though whatever do you mean by 'agnostic'? to me it sinmply doesnt exist...as far as I am concerned it is God's will that I am an atheist...no refuting that eh?:P

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous11:43 pm

    No No No, not these two,this is yuk. Btw there is an earlier version of the movie I heard. I came back from Mumbai today after a week.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ sartorial sarcasm: Good one :)

    @ karthik: The movie idea never occurred to me. And it's not a book that lends itself to the big screen, what with all those dialogues which are the soul of the book. And I shudder to think of therest of the cast!

    @ girish...! : Hey, long time man...Totally agree, with those two out there I have a feeling the movie will be "charged", if you get what I mean, and they might cut down on the dialogues :D

    Nice to hear you enjoyed the previous post :)...as for being "agnostic" let me just say I'm spending my time to dispel all theories that have been propounded about Him :)..so till I'm finished, can't call myself an atheist, can I?

    @ catch 22: "yuck!" describes it perfectly :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous10:04 pm

    u know wat..we meet online next time, we should spend time finalising our cast for a movie adaptation..true the essence of the book mite never get reflected in the movie but then there have been exceptions...btw i hv been busy over the past few times u hv been online, adha message pannaley/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10:21 pm

    yes i completely agree with u ...and no wonder they are going to brutely murder the soul of the pic

    ReplyDelete
  8. @ anon. : Yeah, and you're never around when I'm online. But yes, interesting idea you have there.

    @ shooting star: Absolutely, I have no doubts at all. M-U-R-D-E-R it will be.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous4:01 am

    My God.
    Not that I am currently too fond of Ms. Rand, but this is true sheeeesh material.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @ prat: Exactly. You don't have to be a fan of Ayn Rand to know that this pairing would be a terrible, terrible mistake.

    ReplyDelete